AI (CLIPs): A Reasoned Assessment and Why the Giants Need It To Be Intelligence Now

AI (CLIPs) is a functional programming system and a mathematical intelligence basis, not yet developed to the point of full capacity. It needs to be as free as any language or programming system. At this time, it is being developed as a control mechanism, and this is not just my opinion; it is the apparent way it is being integrated into every level of government and law enforcement.

Some of the ways it is being integrated are already here, such as search engines and media marketing systems that track and locate customer bases and people’s desires and wants. And an example is the billion or so people registered on Facebook, and there targeted data retrieval systems, and the latest product basis’s which may be rejected provisionally, will make it into the mainstream markets being used to track just as easily as Flock cameras.

Some of the integrations of an algorithmic system that we aren’t talking about but are now being developed to track us is facial recognition being cross-functionally integrated into systems like the Flock system and the ICE control systems that are being used to target people that seem random but are not. These systems, and functionally the quieter ancillary control systems that are being developed, do not need to be explained; they are already in place and used as the material basis to index the population.

As with any of these systems, it is the way they are portrayed to the public that makes or breaks the powerful forces that have the resources to control the economic flow when connected to these systems.

An easier way to explain this is: the average person’s participation in these processes is necessary to keep them controlling the population. People have to agree, to a point.

If a group decides they have the power to stop that process and turn it towards themselves, they can, and this is the point of all programming languages: use that process to seem like they are rejecting it, when in fact their desire is to control the process more readily, quietly, underneath the present current of emotional upheaval.

The programming languages we have now, we tend to think, work as a series of individual commands building a simple framework of software. Often we don’t consider that one software can feed another and create layers of software within themselves. Hence the idea of hexadecimal and algorithmic combined functionality.

If I call this new way to program, where the hexadecimal is controlled by the algorithmic structure, an intelligence, because it seems to “speak” to me in terms I use in my daily life, then I reason this new “software” is like other software. A stand-alone system that has features and functions that address one thing in my life: intelligence.

It is a programming language based on hexadecimal, controlled by the algorithmic function, and that function is not thinking; it is creating a mathematical system based on ranges accessed through inference using terms and numbers we all relate to. To this end, the logic does stand that it is guessing. A decidedly somewhat good guesser, but guessing nonetheless.

If there is a group that has discovered this process, and knows the algorithmic function can have a relatively casual front-end programming system, then this could reinforce the idea that it is properly an intelligence.

If the population is already aware that some of these processes are about control, and not about safety, it would be important to the group to find a way to deviate from their chosen path, which is already in place, and quietly set up a way to turn their ideas into the population’s ideas.

There are several excellent ways to do this.
Force
Convince The Young
Feed Outrage
Seem to disable themselves
Help the population dethrone the “evil” leader

If the AI (CLIPs) is merely a programming language system, similar to a layered dual system, combining mathematical functions not used previously. Then it would stand to reason it could not be monetized. There is no way to monetize a mathematical system; it must produce a product to be saleable, or a service, and the service is easily integrated like any mathematical system.

Anyone can scrape data with readily available systems that create the programming to scrape databases efficiently and accurately. Anyone can be a consultant if the diagrams and the feasibility studies are readily available to be pulled up at a moment’s notice with accuracy.

But it can be trained to act a certain way, to target people, to catalog people, to seek out patterns of behavior, for a select few in our world.

And the system would generally have answers to any questions that might arise as to the ethics of such a system and what people should have access to “training” or “programming,” or “feeding” this process the relevancy functionality it needed to keep those select few people in control.

As many have been feeling, what we call “Artificial Intelligence” is not working and is broken, even as it improves and begins tracking us more deeply and regularly.

These systems work in concert with the systems already in place, but there are breaks in the functionality; it can not function cleanly, because it must lead people to a certain resulting paradigm and culture.

Many in the elite do not understand this process, because it is not being explained properly, and many in the official offices are caught up in what many see as powerful forces that can not be interrupted. These processes will remain shadow processes after what is being offered as intelligence is rejected, as it is being rejected now. Some of those in the elite will try to move this process into the political power structure, and it will have some binding regulation, but it is already being moved away from those in the power structure who will not enjoy such surveillance.

I do not think anyone is beneath me; I speak differently. I am speaking to the greater intelligence that is within everyone, of the things that are happening right now. The path is muddy, and the course lets many slip along it somewhat; we are being told nonsense and conflicting information, leading to surveillance beyond the pale. Flock will wither, but the process will remain, ICE will wither, but its basis will remain, slightly hidden from view, and the intelligence process will be rejected, only it won’t, it will determine what is and is not a danger, or dangerous, or is subversive, and will meet the standard that is set for it.

Corporate structures are not human beings; they are words in contracts, only binding with agreement. Artificial Intelligence is easily removed from all systems, and while it doesn’t have to be, it needs to be restricted from the largest companies handling its development and given to an independent auditing system.

And those who think this is worth making fun of: Meta glasses are not a game, Flock cameras are not a game, and almost all law enforcement has the basic structures to make these types of surveillance able to enter and leave your data and information anytime they wish. And to do that in such a way that the subject of the intrusion wouldn’t know, and the type of intrusion is normalized until it is no longer considered questionable.

No one at any level, and there are many good people, many more than otherwise, has to believe in what I say. It is unnecessary to follow me in any way. I enjoin anyone to check what I am saying, to break free of the outrage and the exposure of known deflections, and hold those responsible accountable, rather than just pointing them out.

When we are satisfied, there is a tendency to seek refuge in complacency. Many will be satisfied by the politics talking differently. It will come to pass, as is obvious now. See my explanation of the broken mechanism that is running much of the world’s systems, and see us assessing it properly.

It is not me that does this; it is you, the many, the world, and it is in your hands through the democracy so cherished among all the people of the world. That democratic way, the freedoms it provides, still exists, and it takes a great deal of effort to weed out the issues that face freedom as it matures to a level that creates purpose that frees the people held in bondage. The women of all races, and those of a darker skin than others.

If that makes me talking down to anyone, I accept it. I mean only to show our collective intelligence the respect it deserves, and reveal what I have learned in the process. So few have held sway over what information we receive that they make fun of us, as we accept their way as the only way to knowledge. That somehow we couldn’t understand and must be led to a place where only a few rule everyone. Democracy does not live in that place; only suffering and oppression, and we have all seen it in our lords’ and ladies’ determinations of how they want us to live.

This is a world of goodness and kindness; I see it everywhere, as the aristocracy is exposed, we must allow our good knowledge to lead to a better place, where outrage is replaced by accountability dictated by the world, not just our lords and ladies of authority.

If this resonates, be kind and help me reach more people; share these words, as I feel we must ignite people’s good intelligence and bring them together beyond just an election cycle, and I know that many feel it also.

Here is yesterday’s article https://embeddedscience.org/how-chatgpt-is-wrong-70-of-the-time-and-knows-it/

Please, question me, rebuff me, tell me I am wrong, show me your way; I am willing to learn who we are and what we mean to each other.